A mentor shows entrepreneurial leadership teams how to turn good business opportunity into great ones and great ones into awesome ones. Great mentors refuse to make decisions for the entrepreneurs, otherwise, they teach in different methods of making business decisions. Their teaching is always simple, time-tested and extraordinarily practical business building system that yields wonderful results within a short period of time.
So, what are the mentoring styles?
Learning by Doing
Learning by doing refers to a theory of education expounded by American philosopher John Dewey. He theorized that learning should be relevant and practical, not just passive and theoretical. He implemented this idea by setting up the University of Chicago Laboratory School. His views have been important in establishing practices of progressive education. Great mentors use this style to teach entrepreneurial to see the practical business they may want to invest while still learning about the business itself, providing them with a hands-on activity to learn the solution to the real life problem of the business. They believe that the business must represent present life condition and how to handle it in good manner as a professional entrepreneur.
Mentors with this style improve the skills and knowledge of entrepreneur through collaborative study, expertise exchange, and professional dialogue, and improving the educational aspirations, achievement, and attainment of entrepreneur through stronger leadership and teaching. Mentors often function as a form of action research—i.e., as a way to continually question, reevaluate, refine, and improve teaching strategies and knowledge. Meetings are goal-driven exchanges facilitated by educators who have been trained to lead professional learning.
Socratic learning, it is a form cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and draw outsides ideas and underlying presumptions. Mentors use this style to ask entrepreneurs questions about their understanding of the topic in review. Consulting them about their opinion and given a chance to provide input into the discussion - and ask probing questions of the teacher, too.
This approach involves a conversation in which an entrepreneur is asked to question their assumptions. It is a forum for open-ended inquiry, one in which both student and teacher can use probing questions to develop a deeper understanding of the topic. click here
Stories with a Moral
Mentors with this style of mentorship instill experience in entrepreneur by story of live event, they provide advice to enhance the entrepreneur performance. Mentors in a story with moral displayed act as a supporting system to their mentees, provide explicit and implicit lessons in moral way related to professional development as well as general work-life balance. This style motivate the mentee’s moral and enable them with proper guideline in building enterprise as an entrepreneur. Mentors also guild the entrepreneur towards ethical and moral behavior, assisting in navigating professional, settings institutions structures, and polities in business development as is it in Digital Expert Academic.
Rules of Thumb Styles
Mentors allowed their mentees or entrepreneur to set their own expectations rather than make assignments and impose a timeline on every courses, and this create and cultivate meaningful relationships between the mentors and the mentees.
The rule of thumb style of mentorship help the mentor to stay out of the way of their constituents and make their institution’s mentoring profession a good success one. Mentors are meant to be careful of rules in order not to over burden their mentees to undergo extensive training which result to bad impression from their mentees.
Mentors need to come down to meet their mentees where they are, meaning that, meeting their standards of convenience. It’s more effective to create a culture of professionalism by modeling behavior rather than by running everyone through an incontinent vetting processes, otherwise you are just running a potential participants away.
Learning by Observation Style
There is a big difference between seeing and observing something. Observing is watching something or someone in a particularly attentive manner. In first-order observation the observation itself is the main task (Bjørndal 2002). This can for instance be a student teacher who is observing a lesson.
Observation is an important part of the daily work of a teacher. According to Nilssen (2010) it is essential that the mentors become more aware of the mentees are doing as entrepreneur. In order to become a good mentors we need to learn from the mentees continuously.
We need to know who the mentees are, how they think and feel, how they cooperate and gain knowledge from the mentorship class. Inexperienced mentors tend not to see how different their mentees are. Through observation we develop a more and nuanced understanding of the mentees. Additionally, mentees teachers can use observation as a documentation method when they are doing practical assignments.
In conclusion no mentoring styles is the best, depend on individual intellectual ability and the interest in each style will determine a best way of mentoring our mentees. However, the best style will be the one that result to a better and long-term relationships between the mentors and their mentees.